I read a review. The guy said dont ask questions, just buy it. I did. So far I cant get anything out of it. When I did, lag was unacceptable. I should have asked questions.
No one will believe I hear lag at 5 ms. Unless you do. With just using the system audio, one effect in the middle with a mono input, the lag makes it impossible to consider using for recording, much more for trying overdubs. I will go through all I can read but If you can hear any lag at all in the form of a slight delay effect, no way I could learn to play ahead or behind and be happy. Bluetooth 4.1 has lag, so do all the new new NAMM 2016 products. Apps, except Auria Pro, 0 latency, which I purchased, Auria will chose the internal speakers of the Pro 9.7, 128, wi-fi only, bypassing a connected paired bluetooth speaker, but can be coaxed through a wired connect through the headphone output. Where is the sense? Ok for playback. Still wired. All is cured when its wired, so is all the LE stuff, midi boards, including Roli. There is a long way to go. 2017 NAMM, a little too early, to perfect. I really dont think so. Soundlink II has been fairly good but still slow for the initial startup, after that who cares. I would just use it for playback. I did order a pair of iRigs iLoud professional Bluetooth monitors. My performance demand for those will be extremely high. I have a promised return set up even though they wont be here until October. I would never consider recording with LE headphones, total frustration. NAMM releases. Already tried them, the micro air boards, nope. They were pre-released before NAMM 2016 Summer. Wrapping, If you can make Audiobus a lightning hardware piece, there is a chance. Otherwise I just see problems where none exist, if there is one thing we dont need is frustration in our writing. Feel free to enlighten me. Thank you !!!!!